Alexander Hamilton

Federalist #1 - The Full Text


To the People of the State of New York

After an ample discussion of the proposed Constitution, both in and out of convention, it is at length submitted to the people for their consideration.


Whether it be well or ill designed, is a question of the utmost moment to the United States, since a government instituted by the people themselves can only be altered by themselves;
and the citizens of each State will have an equal voice in deciding on its fate.


It is therefore essential to the exercise of that right that every citizen should be well informed of the objects which it is intended to accomplish, and of the probable effects of the measures proposed to bring them about.

It is not to be doubted that the new Constitution, if adopted, will among its other advantages, prove a very considerable guard against the propensity of the States to engage in mutual hostilities; and the consequent necessity of a large and well-regulated military force, on the part of each State to protect itself.


But the most effectual way to prevent the recurrence of war between the States, is to render the United States, collectively, so powerful that no State, nor any combination of States, would be able to carry on an offensive war against the rest.


This consideration alone must commend the proposed system to every man who is actuated by a sincere zeal for the lasting welfare of his country.

Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and InfluenceAmong the advantages of a well-united government, one of the most obvious and important is the check which it would give to the designs of foreign powers, by discouraging the combinations of different States against each other, and by enabling the Union to act with more vigor and decision in its external relations.


If the States be disconnected, each will have separate interests, and will be liable to be played off against each other by foreign nations.


The danger of this is not merely speculative; we have already seen some alarming symptoms of it.


A circumstance which ought not to be overlooked is, that the vicinity of the United States to the great powers of Europe may expose them to the danger of being drawn into their controversies, and that a circumstance which may make it necessary for them to be prepared for an active and extensive defense.


The most effectual means of preventing this danger are an united government, the whole power of which will be exerted to maintain the peace of the nation, and to protect its interests against foreign aggression.The Importance of a Strong UnionIt is not a matter of slight consideration, when the safety of the republic depends, as much as it does in this case, on the right choice of the government, that the people of America should understand the true nature of the object held up to their view.


If they are not properly informed, their opinions may be influenced by considerations which, when examined, will be found to be either frivolous or false.


And it is not unlikely that the most insidious of these insinuations will be the most successful, because they may not appear so obviously specious as those which are more easily detected.ConclusionIn the course of the ensuing discussions, I shall endeavor to give a fair view of the subject, and to demonstrate that the advantages of a union are not merely speculative, but of the highest importance to the happiness and security of the people of the United States.


- PUBLIUS

Note: This is the full text of Federalist No. 1, attributed to Alexander Hamilton, which primarily focuses on the importance of a strong united government to protect against foreign influence and ensure domestic stability.

Federalist #1 vs. Project 2025


Federalist No. 1 vs. Project 2025: A ComparisonFederalist No. 1, written by Alexander Hamilton in 1787, serves as the introduction to The Federalist Papers, laying out the stakes of ratifying the U.S. Constitution.

It warns against demagogues who might exploit public passions and emphasizes reasoned debate as essential to self-government.

By contrast, Project 2025, led by The Heritage Foundation, is a contemporary policy blueprint for a future conservative presidential administration. It aims to reshape the executive branch by replacing civil servants with political appointees, centralizing power under the president, and implementing conservative social policies.

Key Comparisons

1. Approach to Government Power

Federalist No. 1: Hamilton stresses the importance of deliberation, stability, and constitutional order over reactionary policy swings.

He warns against those who would manipulate the public for personal or factional gain.

Project 2025: Focuses on consolidating executive power, aiming to replace much of the nonpartisan federal bureaucracy with ideological loyalists.

Superiority of Federalist No. 1: Hamilton’s vision promotes checks and balances and warns against excessive consolidation of power, whereas Project 2025 seeks to erode those very barriers.

2. Public Passion vs. Rational Debate

Federalist No. 1: Hamilton cautions against political actors who stir public emotion to push through their agenda, emphasizing reasoned debate over mob rule.

Project 2025: Largely appeals to populist sentiment and cultural grievances, seeking to bypass established norms in favor of swift, ideological policymaking.

Superiority of Federalist No. 1: Hamilton’s warning about demagogues aligns with concerns that Project 2025 prioritizes ideological loyalty over sound governance.

3. Bureaucracy and Constitutional Safeguards

Federalist No. 1: Advocates for a strong but restrained government, bound by constitutional principles and a system of separated powers.

Project 2025: Proposes dismantling much of the federal bureaucracy’s independence, shifting control to political appointees who would serve the executive exclusively.

Superiority of Federalist No. 1: The paper defends the need for institutional stability and expertise, while Project 2025 seeks to politicize administration, potentially undermining governance.

Conclusion

Hamilton’s Federalist No. 1 stands as a foundational argument for constitutional stability, reasoned governance, and the dangers of unchecked power.

In contrast, Project 2025 advocates for a dramatic centralization of power within the executive branch, potentially dismantling safeguards Hamilton saw as essential to the republic’s survival.

By Hamilton’s measure, Project 2025 would be a warning, not a solution—an example of the very dangers he sought to prevent.

Want to work with us?

Your Paragraph text goes Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Autem dolore, alias, numquam enim ab voluptate id quam harum ducimus cupiditate similique quisquam et deserunt, recusandae. here

COMPANY

CUSTOMER CARE

LEGAL

FOLLOW US

Copyright 2025. Cpethink.com. All Rights Reserved.